Today is International Blasphemy Day, so be sure to get out there and insult the god of your choice.
This is going to be one of those serious posts, despite the lead. Because blasphemy is serious. Americans are free to speak against God, or make fun of him, or to simply ignore him. That’s not the case in many other countries. If the evangelicals have their way, it won’t be the case here, either.
In a number of Muslim countries, blasphemy can be punished by death. The same applied to Christian countries until fairly recently, a couple hundred years or so. A long time for individuals, but for humanity as a whole, not that long at all.
A couple posts back, I put up a story about Adam and Eve, after being expelled from the Garden of Eden, figuring out how sex worked, and the idea that this was why God created them in the first place, because he was bored and wanted to watch them having sex. “And on the eighth day, God created voyeur porn,” or something like that.
It’s been said, not always jokingly, that the major passtime for the dead in Heaven is watching their descendants fucking. I don’t personally believe that. I tend to feel that once you’re dead you’re simply dead, no longer exist in a conscious form, and consequently never actually realise you’ve died because you’re no longer there to notice.
In Saudi Arabia, posting that paragraph could get me executed, if I were Muslim. Which I’m not. What I am is, according to my mother, “a poor, lost sinner who’ll surely spend eternity burning in hell.” Christians are so fucking charitable about that sort of thing. What’s the best way to raise your children in your faith? Scare the living shit out them, obviously. Anyway, that would make me a lapsed Baptist, and a former member of the 2nd Baptist Faith in Jesus Tabernacle. Except, I’m not sure “lapsed” is the right word. Lapsed implies a temporary pause, like a lapsed driver’s license, which can be renewed. I find it very unlikely I’ll ever renew that membership, or even encounter any real evidence gods exist.
No, what I am is an atheist. One of the classical ones. I don’t hate God. Sorry, very few atheists do, no matter how big a cliche that is in evangelical belief. We don’t hate Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, Jesus, Vishnu, or Odin, either. God’s just a fictional character, invoked to explain a lot of shit that science hadn’t yet caught up with. Where did the universe come from? What is life? Why am I here? These are questions today, and they were questions in the bronze age, too, but with fewer answers.
Science still hasn’t caught up with that last one, but I think philosophy has. The correct answer is probably, “No particular reason. You just are.” Just because you feel like there should be a reason for everything doesn’t mean there actually is one.
Saying that is blasphemy, too, by the way. Believers generally believe that God is actively guiding the world, ordering things, only putting people here with a special reason. When you confront a Stalin, or a Hitler, or a Mao, or a Pol Pot, you do find yourself wondering just what sort of purpose any of them could serve. Unless you’ve read the Old Testament, after which you might just be able to remember what a genocidal asshole God actually declared himself to be.
Saul lost his kingdom because he pissed off God by failing to slaughter the Amalekite king, Agag, and sparing some of the cattle to offer them as sacrifices in the Tabernacle. Notice he was going to kill the cattle in any case, so his crime was not wasting them, not not killing them. So Samuel declared that God had abandoned Saul, then took a sword and chopped up Agag.
Even when we were learning about this in high school, I found this story a little hard to buy. Did Saul piss off God? Or did he just piss off Samuel, who was, after all, the one actually issuing the orders? Just because the old “prophet” intoned, “Thus saith the Lord,” (we were pretty much a King James Bible type of school), that doesn’t mean the Lord actually said it. Maybe God wasn’t a genocidal asshole. Maybe Samuel was.
Or maybe Samuel was just making this stuff up as he went along. Maybe he was a control-freak psychopath who wanted to see just how far he could get the king to go. Because, if you look at that story, it seems fairly obvious that Samuel had the real power and merely used the king to exercise it. Just as the religious right today tries to manipulate any politician they can influence.
And, of course, it’s also possible that Samuel himself was invented by a later writer. The young George Washington never chopped down that cherry tree, or made that “I cannot tell a lie,” admission of his childish misdeed. That was just something Parson Weems made up and threw into his biography because he thought it would provide a good example for young children.
It’s the same with a lot of people in the Bible. There’s no evidence that Moses ever existed or, for that matter, that a huge mass of Hebrews spent forty-years camped in the Sinai. There’s no evidence that the Hebrews moved into Canaan and conquered it, displacing the native people, though there does seem to be a decent amount of evidence suggesting there were always there and simply expanded and took over their neighbors’ countries over the course of several hundred years.
There’s independent evidence that Saint Paul was a real person, as well as fairly conclusive textual evidence that he didn’t write several of the Epistles that bear his name. Paul’s own writings also suggest he was unfamiliar with a living Jesus, and regarded him not as a flesh and blood man, but as a purely spiritual manifestation of God. The Pauline Epistles, the genuine ones, are older than the gospels, and the Jesus of the gospels almost never says anything that isn’t a direct quote from the Old Testament or early proto-rabbinic sources. In other words, he appears exactly as you’d expect a fictional person to appear if the purpose was the “prove” that particular prophecies had been fulfilled.
There may be independent confirmation of Paul, but there is exactly zero non-biblical contemporary documentation of anything that Jesus was supposed to have done, or even that he existed at all.
Even Jesus’ answer to the “greatest commandment” question is a quote from scripture (not to mention the Jewish daily prayers). In Mark his answer is, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, is one Lord.” Matthew’s version starts after that line, probably because someone noticed that what Jesus supposedly said was a flat denial of trinitarian doctrine. It’s mildly embarrassing when a third of your divine trinity doesn’t actually believe there is such a thing and says so in your holy book.
Oh, by the way, Jesus was a Pharisee. His complaints about them were a call for improvement by a member of the group, sort of like the handful of remaining Republicans in the GOP calling for a return to basic principles and an ouster of the plutocrats, fascists, Dixiecrats, and religious lunatics who’ve managed to take over since the 1980s. A rabbi friend of mine tells me that Jesus’ opinion on divorce identifies him as a follower of Bais Shammai, the stricter of the two scholarly schools of the time. The other, Bais Hillel, which prevailed, was a lot more lenient. Hillel (yes, the guy the campus Jewish outreach program is named after) didn’t require the wife to commit adultery before he’d allow a divorce. Burning her husband’s dinner was sufficient grounds.
So, I guess that’s enough blasphemy for now. I don’t suppose you were expecting this from an erotica writer, but I did blackmail that idiot pervert of a preacher into paying for an Ivy League education. Maybe I was paying attention.